Using working groups to deliver cross-team initiatives
Some initiatives require committed effort and buy-in from multiple teams and functions, over a period of time. In an async culture, this sometimes means that:
- it’s hard to get committed time from contributors
- getting buy-in and sharing updates is harder as there is no habitual way to do it (team channel, source of truth)
In that case, creating a working group can help bring structure and visibility into important cross-functional initiatives.
What is a working group
A working group is a formally defined but ephemeral group of people focused on delivering a cross-functional outcome. Recent examples include making /search
the homepage, and defining cloud personas.
Working groups bring structure and clarity on delivering a specific outcome. A working group should have a clear purpose, participants, and agreed upon communication channels.
Like any structure, it creates some overhead, so we should avoid superfluous working groups. Before creating one consider:
- is the initiative critical to achieving our goals?
- does the initiative require sustained work and coordination over time? If you just need review and alignment, consider writing an RFC.
- is the initiative important for multiple teams or functions?
- are existing communication channels insufficient to achieve the outcome?
If you answered yes to the questions above, creating a working group could help.
Proposing a working group
There is no formal process for creating a working group, but here are a few guidelines to help drive success:
- define the outcome. A working group is not a set organizational structure like a team or an organization. It disappears once its outcome is achieved. Clearly defining the outcome helps set expectations and organize work.
- define how the decision will be made. See making decisions at Sourcegraph.
- sketch out a roadmap.
- write a proposal to share the outcome, identify participants and roadmap widely. Writing an RFC can help.
- collect feedback and create the working group.
Communication channels
If you decide to go forward with the working group, announce it widely. Set up a dedicated communication channel to make sure that all impacted teams are informed and bought into the initiative, and to ask for frequent input. A slack channel, named with a wg-
prefix, is recommended.
Ending a working group
After the outcome has been achieved, or after a given time period has elapsed, the working group should end. If the working group lives for too long (more than two quarters), it probably means that the outcome was too big and needs to be scoped down, or that responsibilities should be transferred to a team.
When you end the working group
- run a retrospective if it’s useful
- write and share a wrap up, share the final outcome
- archive the Slack channel